Showing posts with label Duchess of Cambridge. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Duchess of Cambridge. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 26, 2012

NEVER MIND THE BOLLOCKS, HERE'S THE UPDATED ORDER OF PRECEDENCE







The Queen tells the Duchess of Cambridge to curtsy to the 'blood princesses’



By Richard Eden, The Telegraph
7:30AM BST 24 Jun 2012


   The Duchess of Cambridge may be the future queen, but she has discovered that there are several women in the Royal Family to whom she must show reverence.  Mandrake [1] hears that the Queen has updated the Order of Precedence in the Royal Household to take into account the Duke of Cambridge’s wife. 

   The new rules of Court make it clear that the former Kate Middleton, when she is not accompanied by Prince William, must curtsy to the “blood princesses”, the Princess Royal, Princess Alexandra, and the daughters of the Duke of York, Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie.

   When William is with her, Kate does not need to bend the knee to either of them, but she must curtsy to the Prince of Wales, the Duchess of Cornwall, the Queen and the Duke of Edinburgh.

   Despite being married to the Queen’s son, the Countess of Wessex will, however, have to curtsy to Kate, even when William is not present. 



 

Edward Ferrero (1859):  Illustrating the three-count curtsy.  From The Art Of Dancing, New York, 1859.


   “Updating the Order of Precedence has been a simple matter of following the precedent set when the Prince of Wales married Camilla Parker Bowles,” a courtier tells me.

   A document is said to have been circulated privately in the Royal Household, clarifying Kate’s status. When the Order was last updated, after Prince Charles’s second marriage, in 2005, the Countess of Wessex was reported to be upset that she now had to curtsy to Camilla. “She didn’t like it one bit,” a senior courtier was quoted as saying.

   The Earl of Wessex’s wife had previously been the second-highest ranking woman in the Royal family because neither of the Queen’s other sons, Charles and Prince Andrew, were married. 




Truly penny dreadful


   The Order of Precedence affects other aspects of royal protocol, such as who arrives first at an event. For example, Camilla was forced to wait in the drizzle outside the Guards Chapel, Windsor, for the arrival of Princess Anne at a memorial service in 2006, because Charles had not accompanied her. A Buckingham Palace spokesman declines to comment.

   However, after Charles remarried, the Queen changed the Order of Precedence “on blood principles” so that neither Princess Anne nor Princess Alexandra, the granddaughter of George V, would have to curtsy to Camilla when her husband was not present.

   Although the etiquette may seem arcane, it is taken very seriously by the Royal family, whose members bow and curtsy to each other in public and in private. A vivid illustration came after the Trooping the Colour ceremony last weekend, when Kate could be seen curtsying to Prince Philip on the balcony of Buckingham Palace. 






Thomas Hillgrove (1863):  Illustrating the four-count curtsy.  From A Complete Practical Guide To The Art Of Dancing, New York, 1863.


   The Order of Precedence affects other aspects of royal protocol, such as who arrives first at an event. For example, Camilla was forced to wait in the drizzle outside the Guards Chapel, Windsor, for the arrival of Princess Anne at a memorial service in 2006, because Charles had not accompanied her. A Buckingham Palace spokesman declines to comment. 


[1]  For those who do not regularly  read The Telegraph, “Mandrake” is a news/gossip column edited by Tim Walker.







   NOTE:  It must be the heat and the phone calls not being returned prompting  this murderous mood and desire to confront discourteously this story about royal curtsies (to whom one must curtsy; when; why) and the updated Royal Household Order of Precedence.

   A curtsey (also spelled curtsy or courtesy), as most people learn in childhood, is a traditional gesture of greeting, in which a girl or woman bends her knees while bowing her head.  It is the female equivalent of male bowing in Western cultures. Miss Manners characterizes its knee bend as deriving from a "traditional gesture of an inferior to a superior." The word "curtsy" is a phonological change from "courtesy" known in linguistics as syncope.

  With Europe failing, China slowing, Americans at daggers with their countrymen, and Hugo Chavez in as incurably a bad mood as I am (only Vladimir Putin seems to be enjoying himself lately), the revised “according to Hoyle” of curtsies (“in public and in private”) seems extraordinarily stupid today.  

  I remind myself, then, that Queen Elizabeth II is probably the only person alive who knows who killed JFK and the secrets of Roswell, so I forgive her a lot and I would like to think that this may be her idea of humor.  But sometimes I wonder whether THIS   might also be.







A lovely young girl curtsying and presenting flowers to Queen Elizabeth II during her 1954 visit to Brisbane, Australia.

Friday, August 5, 2011

Why "There Will Always Be An England" (Royal Wedding Special No. 5)








        "When the most talked-about dress in modern times went on display in Buckingham Palace last week, its owner the Duchess of Cambridge and her grandmother-in-law the Queen stood transfixed.  

         Hundreds of millions of people around the world had held their collective breath as Kate Middleton arrived at Westminster Abbey on 29 April, waiting for the moment when her full-skirted ivory and white satin gazar wedding gown, created by Alexander McQueen designer Sarah Burton, would finally be revealed. 

        Now, those lucky enough to get a ticket have a chance to see the dress at close quarters, during Buckingham Palace’s annual summer opening.







         Standing on a plinth beneath six grand chandeliers, it takes centre stage in the Palace’s majestic Ballroom, usually the scene of state occasions and investitures.

        Among the first and most important guests to see the fascinating exhibition, just one day before its grand public opening, were the Duchess of Cambridge wearing a light-beige L 395 Joseph Scala dress and the Queen.

        As the present and future Queens gazed at the display, memories of the day Her Majesty had called 'amazing' no doubt came flooding back.  But the Queen’s first reaction on seeing the headless mannequin upon which the dress hangs was less than complimentary. 

       Overheard in conversation with Kate, she commented that the ghostly tailor’s dummy – which appears to float in mid-air – made it look 'horrible' and 'creepy'








        Known for her strong opinions, the Queen clearly feels comfortable enough with her newest granddaughter-in-law to speak so plainly about the gown’s presentation.

      The Duchess countered with her view that the display had a '3D effect,' as well as how the exhibition felt slightly unreal.  'It’s surreal looking at it now . . . It’s very weird,' she was overheard saying."


(From Hello! No. 1185, 1 August 2011: The Queen and Kate View Her Iconic Bridal Gown At Buckingham Palace”)







NOTE This story surprised me and made me laugh.   Although it is written with a completely straight face and not a bit of humor (nothing even remotely tongue-in-cheek), I assume the editors at Hello! also laughed about the scene they describe so vividly while sitting around the conference table in London.  Imagine being the former Catherine Middleton and mounting your first major independent public relations event involving the display of your own wedding dress in the Queen of England's principal residence and having Her Majesty (quite correctly) describe the mise-en-scene as "horrible" and "creepy."  I know that the Queen knows her horses and corgis and I suspect her knowledge and love of animals includes a strong and refined aesthetic sense.  Having grown up  around natural and man-made (i.e., artistic) beauty her entire life and employing a retinue of aestheticians (including the late, feckless, ruined Sir Anthony Blunt) has doubtless made her extremely knowledgeable and highly confident in her judgements, especially now that she has attained the venerable age of 85.   HRH's  directness here reminds me a lot of my late mother-in-law, Caroline Butler Prutzman, a woman who was also very confident and direct in her pronouncements and actions, especially late in life when she had a chance to take stock of what she knew and what others didn't.  She was always polite, and even though she didn't have the influence and power of a monarch, she spoke her mind clearly and precisely.   The Duchess of Cambridge's "3D" reply is absurd, of course, but I'm prepared to cut her a break.  This must have been a distinctly uncomfortable moment for a young woman starting out in married life.  One more thing:  I refuse to believe that Catherine Middleton actually wore those high heels under her wedding gown.  I believe she must have worn flats and substituted these later as the "official shoes".  Any reader thoughts on this subject?  (Please note that all photos included above, with the exception of the black & white image of the Queen wearing the Grand Duchess Vladimir tiara, a gift to her from her grandmother Queen Mary, enlarge beautifully when mouse-clicked.)